Advertisement
Research Article| Volume 8, ISSUE 6, P571-579, December 2022

How the 2020 US Presidential election impacted sleep and its relationship to public mood and alcohol consumption

Published:October 21, 2022DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sleh.2022.08.009

      Abstract

      Objectives

      Major sociopolitical events can influence the general public's affective state and other affect-related processes, such as sleep. Here, we investigated the extent that the 2020 US presidential election impacted sleep, public mood, and alcohol consumption. We also explored the relationship between affect and sleep changes during the peak period of election stress.

      Participants

      US-residing (n = 437) and non-US-residing (n = 106) participants were recruited online for participation in the study.

      Methods

      A non-representative, convenience sample responded to daily assessments of their affect, sleep, and alcohol consumption during a baseline period (October 1-13, 2020) and in the days surrounding the 2020 US Election (October 30-November 12, 2020).

      Results

      Analyses determined changes within and between US and non-US participants. Election Day evoked significantly reduced sleep amount and efficiency, coupled with heightened stress, negative affect, and increased alcohol use. While US participants were significantly more impacted in a number of domains, non-US participants also reported reduced sleep and greater stress compared to baseline. Across participants, disrupted sleep on Election Night correlated with changes in emotional well-being and alcohol consumption on Election Day.

      Conclusion

      These results suggest that major sociopolitical events can have global impacts on sleep that may interact with significant fluctuations in public mood and well-being. Further, while the largest impact is on the local population, these results suggest that the effects can extend beyond borders. These findings highlight the potential impact of future sociopolitical events on public well-being.

      Keywords

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Sleep Health: Journal of the National Sleep Foundation
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      REFERENCES

        • American Academy of Sleep Medicine
        AASM Sleep Prioritization Survey Monday after the Super Bowl.
        April 13, 2021 (Published online 2019Accessed)
        • American Academy of Sleep Medicine
        AASM Sleep Prioritization Survey After Election Night.
        April 13, 2021 (Published online October 20, 2021Accessed)
        • Anýž J
        • Bakštein E
        • Dudysová D
        • et al.
        No wink of sleep: Population sleep characteristics in response to the brexit poll and the 2016 U.S. presidential election.
        Soc Sci Med. 2019; 222: 112-121https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2018.12.024
        • Wright KP
        • Linton SK
        • Withrow D
        • et al.
        Sleep in university students prior to and during COVID-19 Stay-at-Home orders.
        Curr Biol. 2020; 30: R797-R798https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2020.06.022
        • Comer JS
        • Golik A
        • Martin J.
        Children's Mental Health After 9/11 and the Boston Marathon Bombing.
        in: Hoven CW Amsel LV Tyano S An International Perspective on Disasters and Children's Mental Health. Integrating Psychiatry and Primary Care. Springer International Publishing, Cham, Switzerland2019: 73-91https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-15872-9_5
        • Fernquist RM.
        An aggregate analysis of professional sports, suicide, and homicide rates: 30 U.S. metropolitan areas, 1971–1990.
        Aggress Violent Behav. 2000; 5: 329-341https://doi.org/10.1016/S1359-1789(98)00012-3
        • Joiner TE
        • Hollar D
        • Orden KV.
        On Buckeyes, Gators, Super Bowl Sunday, and the Miracle on Ice: “Pulling Together” is Associated With Lower Suicide Rates.
        J Soc Clin Psychol. 2006; 25: 179-195https://doi.org/10.1521/jscp.2006.25.2.179
        • Scheibe S
        • Mata R
        • Carstensen LL.
        Age differences in affective forecasting and experienced emotion surrounding the 2008 US presidential election.
        Cogn Emot. 2011; 25: 1029-1044https://doi.org/10.1080/02699931.2010.545543
        • Schwarz N
        • Strack F
        • Kommer D
        • Wagner D.
        Soccer, rooms, and the quality of your life: mood effects on judgments of satisfaction with life in general and with specific domains.
        Eur J Soc Psychol. 1987; 17: 69-79https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2420170107
        • Trovato F.
        The Stanley Cup of Hockey and Suicide in Quebec, 1951–1992*.
        Soc Forces. 1998; 77: 105-126https://doi.org/10.1093/sf/77.1.105
        • Rahn WM
        • Kroeger B
        • Kite CM.
        A framework for the study of public mood.
        Polit Psychol. 1996; 17: 29-58https://doi.org/10.2307/3791942
        • Ringmar E.
        What are public moods?.
        Eur J Soc Theory. 2018; 21: 453-469https://doi.org/10.1177/1368431017736995
        • Smith ER.
        Chapter 13 - Social identity and social emotions: toward new conceptualizations of prejudice.
        in: Mackie DM Hamilton DL Affect, Cognition and Stereotyping. Academic Press, Cambridge, MA1993: 297-315https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-088579-7.50017-X
        • Abele A
        • Gendofla GHE
        • Petzold P.
        Positive mood and in-group-out-group differentiation in a minimal group setting.
        Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 1998; 24: 1343-1357https://doi.org/10.1177/01461672982412008
        • Hoyt LT
        • Zeiders KH
        • Chaku N
        • Toomey RB
        • Nair RL.
        Young adults’ psychological and physiological reactions to the 2016 U.S. presidential election.
        Psychoneuroendocrinology. 2018; 92: 162-169https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psyneuen.2018.03.011
        • Haack M
        • Mullington JM.
        Sustained sleep restriction reduces emotional and physical well-being.
        Pain. 2005; 119: 56-64https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pain.2005.09.011
      1. Vandekerckhove M, Weiss R, Schotte C, Exadaktylos V, Haex B, Cluydts R. The role of presleep negative emotion in sleep physiology. 2011;48(12):1738-44. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8986.2011.01281.x. Epub 2011 Sep 6. PMID: 21895689

        • Vandekerckhove M
        • Wang Y
        Emotion, emotion regulation and sleep: an intimate relationship.
        AIMS Neurosci. 2017; 5: 1-17https://doi.org/10.3934/Neuroscience.2018.1.1
        • Williams A
        • Clark D.
        Alcohol consumption in university students: the role of reasons for drinking, coping strategies, expectancies, and personality traits.
        Addict Behav. 1998; 23: 371-378https://doi.org/10.1016/S0306-4603(97)80066-4
        • Glindemann KE
        • Wiegand DM
        • Geller ES.
        Celebratory Drinking and intoxication: a contextual influence on alcohol consumption.
        Environ Behav. 2007; 39: 352-366https://doi.org/10.1177/001391650290949
        • Cunningham TJ
        • Fields E
        • Kensinger EA.
        Boston College daily sleep and well-being survey data during early phase of the COVID-19 pandemic.
        Sci Data. 2021; (Published online)https://doi.org/10.1038/s41597-021-00886-y
        • Cunningham TJ
        • Fields EC
        • Garcia SM
        • Kensinger EA.
        The relation between age and experienced stress, worry, affect, and depression during the spring 2020 phase of the COVID-19 pandemic in the United States.
        Emotion. June 17, 2021; (Published online)https://doi.org/10.1037/emo0000982
        • Fields EC
        • Kensinger EA
        • Garcia SM
        • Ford JH
        • Cunningham TJ.
        With age comes well-being: older age associated with lower stress, negative affect, and depression throughout the COVID-19 pandemic.
        Aging Ment Health. 2021; 0: 1-9https://doi.org/10.1080/13607863.2021.2010183
        • Ford JH
        • Garcia SM
        • Fields EC
        • Cunningham TJ
        • Kensinger EA.
        Older adults remember more positive aspects of the COVID-19 pandemic.
        Psychol Aging. 2021; 36: 694-699https://doi.org/10.1037/pag0000636
      2. Clark LA, Watson D. The PANAS-X: manual for the positive and negative affect schedule - Expanded Form. Published online 1994. doi:10.17077/48vt-m4t2

        • Kroenke K
        • Spitzer RL.
        The PHQ-9: a new depression diagnostic and severity measure.
        Psychiatr Ann. 2002; 32: 509-515https://doi.org/10.3928/0048-5713-20020901-06
        • Kroenke K
        • Strine TW
        • Spitzer RL
        • Williams JBW
        • Berry JT
        • Mokdad AH.
        The PHQ-8 as a measure of current depression in the general population.
        J Affect Disord. 2009; 114: 163-173https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2008.06.026
        • Harris PA
        • Taylor R
        • Minor BL
        • et al.
        The REDCap consortium: building an international community of software platform partners.
        J Biomed Inform. 2019; 95103208https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbi.2019.103208
        • Harris PA
        • Taylor R
        • Thielke R
        • Payne J
        • Gonzalez N
        • Conde JG.
        Research electronic data capture (REDCap)—a metadata-driven methodology and workflow process for providing translational research informatics support.
        J Biomed Inform. 2009; 42: 377-381https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbi.2008.08.010
        • Rodriguez-Seijas C
        • Fields EC
        • Bottary R
        • et al.
        Comparing the impact of COVID-19-related social distancing on mood and psychiatric indicators in sexual and gender minority (SGM) and non-SGM individuals.
        Front Psychiatry. 2020; 11 (Accessed May 27, 2022)
        • Bottary R
        • Fields EC
        • Kensinger EA
        • Cunningham TJ.
        Age and chronotype influenced sleep timing changes during the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic.
        J Sleep Res. 2022; 31: e13495https://doi.org/10.1111/jsr.13495
        • R Core Team
        R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing.
        R Foundation for Statistical Computing. 2017;
        • Bates D
        • Mächler M
        • Bolker B
        • Walker S.
        Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4.
        J Stat Softw. 2015; 67https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v067.i01
        • Kuznetsova A
        • Brockhoff PB
        • Christensen RHB.
        lmerTest package: tests in linear mixed effects models.
        J Stat Softw. 2017; 82https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v082.i13
      3. Singmann S, Bolker B, Westfall J, Aust F, Ben-Schachar MS.Afex: Analysis of Factorial Experiments (Version 0.28-1). [Computer Software].; 2021. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=afex

        • Sandhu A
        • Seth M
        • Gurm HS.
        Daylight savings time and myocardial infarction.
        Open Heart. 2014; 1e000019https://doi.org/10.1136/openhrt-2013-000019
        • Fairclough SH
        • Graham R.
        Impairment of driving performance caused by sleep deprivation or alcohol: a comparative study.
        Hum Factors. 1999; 41: 118-128https://doi.org/10.1518/001872099779577336
        • Holbein JB
        • Schafer JP
        • Dickinson DL.
        Insufficient sleep reduces voting and other prosocial behaviours.
        Nat Hum Behav. 2019; 3: 492-500https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-019-0543-4
        • Schafer J
        • Holbein JB.
        When time is of the essence: a natural experiment on how time constraints influence elections.
        J Polit. 2020; 82: 418-432https://doi.org/10.1086/706110
        • Zinkhan M
        • Berger K
        • Hense S
        • et al.
        Agreement of different methods for assessing sleep characteristics: a comparison of two actigraphs, wrist and hip placement, and self-report with polysomnography.
        Sleep Med. 2014; 15: 1107-1114https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sleep.2014.04.015