A provisional tool for the measurement of sleep satisfaction

Published:December 17, 2017DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sleh.2017.11.002

      Abstract

      Objectives

      The goal of this project was to provisionally identify the basic elements of sleep satisfaction within the general population.

      Methods

      The National Sleep Foundation conducted a systematic literature review and identified 495 published articles evaluating potential indicators of sleep satisfaction. The National Sleep Foundation then convened an expert panel (“Panel”), provided full-text articles and summaries, and used a modified RAND appropriateness method with three total rounds of voting to determine the appropriateness of indicators for sleep satisfaction.

      Results

      The literature review revealed no tools or measures of sleep satisfaction (not dissatisfaction) applied to the general population and directly associated with good health. Nonetheless, a variety of sleep factors were extracted from the extant sleep research literature. Panel members voted on these indicators: sleep environmental factors; and sleep initiation and maintenance parameters. Using these indicators, the Panel constructed provisional questions for measuring sleep satisfaction.

      Conclusions

      The Panel determined that appropriate sleep satisfaction elements include how an individual feels (a) about their sleep, (b) immediately after their sleep, and (c) during the subsequent day. Additionally, appropriate environmental elements include (a) bedding comfort, (b) bedroom temperature, and (c) noise and light in the bedroom. How one feels with (a) the time it takes to fall asleep, (b) the ease with which one falls back to sleep after awakening during a sleep period, (c) the amount of sleep on weekdays and weekends, as well as how undisturbed one's sleep is also were determined to be appropriate contributors to sleep satisfaction. Finally, the Panel agreed that whether an individual desired to change anything about their sleep, is a relevant question.

      Keywords

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      References

        • Guilleminault C.
        Sleeping and Waking Disorders: Indications and Techniques.
        Addison-Wesley Pub. Co., Medical/Nursing Division, Menlo Park, Calif.1982
        • Douglass A.B.
        • Bomstein R.
        • Nino-Murcia G.
        • Keenan S.
        • Miles L.
        • Zarcone V.P.
        • et al.
        The sleep disorders questionnaire I: creation and multivariate structure of SDQ.
        Sleep. 1994; 17: 160-167https://doi.org/10.1093/sleep/17.2.160
        • Buysse D.J.
        • Reynolds III, C.F.
        • Monk T.H.
        • Berman S.R.
        • Kupfer D.J.
        The Pittsburgh sleep quality index: a new instrument for psychiatric practice and research.
        Psychiatry Res. 1989; 28: 193-213
        • Hirshkowitz M.
        • Whiton K.
        • Albert S.M.
        • Alessi C.
        • Bruni O.
        • DonCarlos L.
        • et al.
        National Sleep Foundation's sleep time duration recommendations: methodology and results summary.
        Sleep Health J Natl Sleep Found. 2015; 1: 40-43https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sleh.2014.12.010
        • Hirshkowitz M.
        • Whiton K.
        • Albert S.M.
        • Alessi C.
        • Bruni O.
        • DonCarlos L.
        • et al.
        National Sleep Foundation's updated sleep duration recommendations: final report.
        Sleep Health. 2015; 1: 233-243https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sleh.2015.10.004
        • Ohayon M.
        • Wickwire E.M.
        • Hirshkowitz M.
        • Albert S.M.
        • Avidan A.
        • Daly F.J.
        • et al.
        National Sleep Foundation's sleep quality recommendations: first report.
        Sleep Health J Natl Sleep Found. 2017; 3: 6-19https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sleh.2016.11.006
        • Ramlee F.
        • Sanborn A.N.
        • Tang N.K.Y.
        What sways People's judgment of sleep quality? A quantitative choice-making study with good and poor sleepers.
        Sleep. 2017; 40https://doi.org/10.1093/sleep/zsx091
        • Ohayon M.M.
        Improving decisionmaking processes with the fuzzy logic approach in the epidemiology of sleep disorders.
        J Psychosom Res. 1999; 47: 297-311https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3999(99)00010-0