Review Article| Volume 1, ISSUE 4, P257-267, December 2015

Download started.


Effect of different mattress designs on promoting sleep quality, pain reduction, and spinal alignment in adults with or without back pain; systematic review of controlled trials

Published:October 19, 2015DOI:


      A significant number of US citizens lack appropriate sleep for several reasons. Back pain has been identified as possible cause for inappropriate sleep in adults. Previously, the quality of mattresses and bedding systems has been correlated to the pain perceived by individuals. However, there is controversy in the literature regarding the type and characteristics of a mattress that best serve the purpose of decreasing spinal pain, and improving spinal alignment and quality of sleep. This study gathered the best available evidence in the literature related to this matter through conducting a systematic review of controlled trials that were published since the year of 2000. In those trials, mattresses were subjectively identified as soft, medium firm, firm, or custom inflated. Articles examining the effect of temperature alterations of mattresses on promoting sleep quality and reducing pain were included as well. Twenty-four articles qualified for inclusion into this systematic review. The methodological quality of the reviewed clinical trials was deemed moderate to high according to the PEDro scale. Results of this systematic review show that a mattress that is subjectively identified as a medium-firm mattress and is custom inflated (self-adjusted) is optimal for promoting sleep comfort, quality, and spinal alignment. Evidence is not sufficient yet regarding the appropriate temperature of the optimum mattress; however, warm temperature has been recommended by authors.


      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'


      Subscribe to Sleep Health: Journal of the National Sleep Foundation
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect


        • Tonetti L.L.
        • Martoni M.M.
        • Natale V.V.
        Effects of different mattresses on sleep quality in healthy subjects: an actigraphic study.
        Biol Rhythm Res. 2011; 42: 89-97
        • Jacobson B.
        • Boolani A.
        • Dunklee G.
        • Shepardson A.
        • Acharya H.
        Effect of prescribed sleep surfaces on back pain and sleep quality in patients diagnosed with low back and shoulder pain.
        Appl Ergon. 2010; 42: 91-97
        • Jacobson B.
        • Wallace T.
        • Gemmell H.
        Subjective rating of perceived back pain, stiffness and sleep quality following introduction of medium-firm bedding systems.
        J Chiropr Med. 2006; 5: 128-134
        • Jacobson B.
        • Gemmell H.
        • Hayes B.
        • Altena T.
        Effectiveness of a selected bedding system on quality of sleep, low back pain, shoulder pain, and spine stiffness.
        J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2002; 25: 88-92
        • Jacobson B.
        • Wallace T.
        • Smith D.
        • Kolb T.
        Grouped comparisons of sleep quality for new and personal bedding systems.
        Appl Ergon. 2008; 39: 247-254
        • DeVocht J.
        • Wilder D.
        • Bandstra E.
        • Spratt K.
        Biomechanical evaluation of four different mattresses.
        Appl Ergon. 2006; 37: 297-304
        • Shields N.
        • Capper J.
        • Polak T.
        • Taylor N.
        Are cervical pillows effective in reducing neck pain?.
        N Z J Physiother. 2006; 34: 3-9
        • Kovacs F.M.
        • Abraira V.
        • Peña A.
        • et al.
        Effect of firmness of mattress on chronic non-specific low-back pain: randomized, double-blind, controlled, multicentre trial.
        Lancet. 2003; 362: 1599-1604
        • McCall W.V.
        • Boggs N.
        • Letton A.
        Changes in sleep and wake in response to different sleeping surfaces: a pilot study.
        Appl Ergon. 2012; 43: 386-391
        • Bergholdt K.
        • Fabricius R.
        • Bendix T.
        Better backs by better beds?.
        Spine. 2008; 33: 703-708
        • Jacobson B.
        • Boolani A.
        • Smith D.
        Changes in back pain, sleep quality, and perceived stress after introduction of new bedding systems.
        J Chiropr Med. 2009; 8: 1-8
        • Monsein M.
        • Corbin T.P.
        • Culliton P.D.
        • Merz D.
        • Schuck E.A.
        Short-term outcomes of chronic back pain patients on an airbed vs innerspring mattresses.
        MedGenMed. 2000; 2: E36
        • Price P.
        • Rees-Matthews S.
        • Tebble N.
        • Camilleri J.
        The use of a new overlay mattress in patients with chronic pain: impact on sleep and self-reported pain.
        Clin Rehabil. 2003; 17: 488-492
        • Portney L.G.
        • Watkins M.P.
        Foundations of clinical research: applications to practice.
        3rd ed. Pearson/Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, N.J.2009
        • Articles, Research, & News
        (Retrieved November 6, 2014. From)
        • Lahm R.
        • Iaizzo P.A.
        Physiologic responses during rest on a sleep system at varied degrees of firmness in a normal population.
        Ergonomics. 2002; 45: 798-815
        • López-Torres M.
        • Porcar R.
        • Solaz J.
        • Romero T.
        Objective firmness, average pressure and subjective perception in mattresses for the elderly.
        Appl Ergon. 2008; 39: 123-130
        • Raymann R.J.E.M.
        • Swaab D.F.
        • Van Someren E.J.W.
        Skin deep: enhanced skin depth by cutaneous temperature manipulation.
        Brain J Neurol. 2008; 131: 500-513
        • Verhaert V.
        • Haex D.
        • De Wilde T.
        • et al.
        Ergonomics in bed design: the effect of spinal alignment on sleep parameters.
        Ergonomics. 2011; 54: 169-178
        • Park S.J.
        • Lee H.-J.
        • Hong K.H.
        • Kim J.T.
        Evaluation of mattress for the Koreans.
        Proc Hum Factors Ergon Soc Annu Meet. 2001; 45: 727-730
        • Shen L.
        • Chen Y.
        • Guo Y.
        • et al.
        Research on the relationship between the structural properties of bedding layer in spring mattress and sleep quality.
        Work. 2012; 41: 1268-1273
        • Lee H.
        • Park S.
        Quantitative effects of mattress types (comfortable vs. uncomfortable) on sleep quality through polysomnography and skin temperature.
        International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics. 2006; 36: 943-949
        • Leilnahari K.
        • Fatouraee N.
        • Khodalotfi M.
        • Sadeghein M.A.
        • Amin Kashani Y.
        Spine alignment in men during lateral sleep position: experimental study and modeling.
        Biomed Eng Online. 2011; 10: 103
        • Norman M.
        • Descarreaux M.
        • Poulin C.
        • et al.
        Biomechanical effects of a lumbar support in a mattress.
        J Can Chiropr Assoc. 2005; 49: 96-101
        • Bader G.G.
        • Engdal S.
        The influence of bed firmness on sleep quality.
        Appl Ergon. 2000; 31: 487-497
        • Hyunja L.
        • Park S.
        Quantitative effects of mattress types (comfortable vs. uncomfortable) on sleep quality through polysomnography and skin temperature.
        Int J Ind Ergon. 2006; 36: 943-949
        • Verhaert V.
        • Van Deun D.
        • Verbraecken J.
        • et al.
        Smart control of spinal alignment through active adjustment of mechanical bed properties during sleep.
        J Ambient Intell Smart Environ. 2013; 5: 369-380